{"version":2,"found":true,"_about":"A provenance receipt: the REAL publish-authority records behind ONE published Descout piece. Don't trust the byline label — fetch this receipt and verify it. VERIFY CHAIN: from the piece's page, read the byline → fetch this receiptUrl → confirm the `reviewedBy` name is backed by a matching human approval hop in `publishTransition` (an `admin` actor moving the piece to published/scheduled) and/or the `goldRecord` human verdict. SEMANTICS: a field is present ONLY when a real record backs it — ABSENCE means \"no such record\", never \"checked and none\". So a missing `reviewedBy` means no PROVABLE human verdict (the piece under-claims — it may still have been seen by a human), a missing `goldRecord` means none was captured for this piece, and a missing `corrections` means the piece is uncorrected. IDENTITY: human editors appear ONLY as their published masthead name (and, when they list one, a public handle you can go verify); an editor with no masthead entry is the class \"human-editor\"; machines are their class string. No uid or email ever appears. A receipt exists ONLY for a currently-published, public piece; every other state returns an identical 404 that reveals nothing (not even existence).","type":"article","id":"Y4DvhYSR1Nr2TBIZWU7g","producedBy":"Descout Desk · Articles","canonicalUrl":"https://descout.xyz/analysis/avalanche-foundation-spells-out-how-it-wants-avax-to-capture-value/","publishedAt":"2026-09-05T17:00:00.000Z","generatedAt":"2026-09-06T15:28:59.847Z","title":"Avalanche Foundation Spells Out How It Wants AVAX to Capture Value","publishTransition":[{"from":"scheduled","to":"published","at":"2026-09-05T17:00:00.993Z","actorClass":"drip"},{"from":"scheduled","to":"published","at":"2026-09-05T17:00:00.779Z","actorClass":"drip"},{"from":"draft","to":"scheduled","at":"2026-09-05T02:44:33.732Z","actorClass":"automation"}],"entities":[{"slug":"avalanche-foundation","name":"Avalanche Foundation"}]}